GABA-mediated neurotransmission in the nucleus of the solitary tract alters resting ventilation following exposure to chronic hypoxia in conscious rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigated whether changes in GABA-mediated neurotransmission within the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) contribute to the changes in breathing (resting ventilation and the acute HVR) that occur following exposure to chronic hypoxia (CH). Rats were exposed to 9 days of hypobaric hypoxia (0.5 atm) and then subjected to acute hypoxic breathing trials before and after bilateral microinjections of GABA, bicuculline (a GABAA-receptor antagonist), or bicuculline plus CGP-35348 (a GABAB receptor antagonist) into the caudal regions of the NTS. Breathing was measured using whole body plethysmography. CH caused an increase in resting ventilation when the animals were breathing 30% O2 but did not alter ventilation during acute hypoxia (10% O2). GABA alone had no effect on breathing in either the control or chronically hypoxic rats. Bicuculline and bicuculline/CGP had no effect on breathing in control rats. Following CH, bicuculline and bicuculline/CGP reduced minute ventilation (VI) during acute exposure to 30% O2 but had no effect during acute exposure to 10% O2. The bicuculline-induced reduction in VI resulted from a decrease in breathing frequency (fR) and tidal volume (VT). The bicuculline/CGP-induced reduction in VI was due to a decrease in fR with no change in VT. The results suggest that changes in GABA receptor-mediated neurotransmission, within the NTS, are involved in the increase in resting ventilation that occurs following CH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".