MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011041884 · doi:10.1115/ht2013-17166

A Numerical Study of Natural Convective Heat Transfer From Isothermal High Aspect Ratio Rectangular Cylinders

2013· article· en· W2011041884 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick H. Oosthuizen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanicsPrandtl numberCylinderHeat transferRayleigh numberNatural convectionAspect ratio (aeronautics)Materials scienceLaminar flowNusselt numberIsothermal processAdiabatic processThermodynamicsPhysicsReynolds numberGeometryTurbulenceMathematicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural convective heat transfer from isothermal rectangular cylinders which have an exposed upper surface has been numerically studied. The cylinders considered have high aspect ratios, i.e., have high width-to-depth ratios, and are relatively short, i.e., have a “height” that is of the same order of magnitude as their width. The cylinders considered are mounted on a plane adiabatic base, the cylinders being normal to the plane base with the cylinders pointing either vertically upwards or vertically downwards. One of the main aims of the present work was to numerically determine how the depth-to-width ratio of the rectangular cylinder influences the mean heat transfer rate from the cylinder when this depth-to-width ratio is large. The flow has also been assumed to be steady and laminar and it has been assumed that the fluid properties are constant except for the density change with temperature which gives rise to the buoyancy forces, this having been treated by using the Boussinesq approach. The solution has been obtained by numerically solving the governing equations using the commercial CFD solver, ANSYS FLUENT©. The solution is dependent on the Rayleigh number, the ratio of the width to the height of the heated cylinder, the ratio of the width to the depth of the heated cylinder, the Prandtl number, Pr, and on whether the cylinder is pointing vertically upwards or vertically downwards. Because of the applications that motivated this study, results have only been obtained for a Prandtl number of 0.74, i.e., effectively the value for air. A range of the other governing parameters has been considered and the effects of these governing parameters on the Nusselt number variation have been examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNanofluid Flow and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207