MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011063536 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m008097200

The Channel-forming Protein Proaerolysin Remains a Dimer at Low Concentrations in Solution

2001· article· en· W2011063536 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan Barry, Susan C. Moore, Alicia Alonso, Juan Ausió, J. Thomas Buckley

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDimerChemistryChannel (broadcasting)BiophysicsBiologyComputer scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proaerolysin, the proform of the channel-forming protein aerolysin, is secreted as a dimer by Aeromonas sp. The protein also exists as a dimer in the crystal, as well as in solution, at least at concentrations in the region of 500 microg/ml. Recently it has been argued that proaerolysin becomes monomeric at concentrations below 100 microg/ml and that only the monomeric form of the protoxin can bind to cell surface receptors (Fivaz, M., Velluz, M.-C., and van der Goot, F. G. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 37705-37708). Here we show, using non-denaturing polyacrylamide electrophoresis, chemical cross-linking, and analytical ultracentrifugation, that proaerolysin remains dimeric at the lowest concentrations of the protein that we measured (less than 5 microg/ml) and that the dimeric protoxin is quite capable of receptor binding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicBacteriophages and microbial interactionsFrench-language works237,207