MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2011080945 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-2324

Abstract 2324: RhoGTPase-based regulation of cell motility by Plk4.

2013· article· en· W2011080945 on OpenAlexaff
Volha Brashavitskaya, Karineh Kazazian, Carla O. Rosario, Francis Si Wai Zih, Yosr Z. Haffani, James W. Dennis, Tony Pawson, Carol J. Swallow

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRHOACell biologyCDC42ChemistryMitosisBiologyKinaseSignal transduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background. Polo-like kinase 4 (Plk4) is a serine-threonine kinase that localizes to centrioles and is essential for centriole duplication. Plk4 expression is increased in colorectal, pancreas and breast cancers, and predicts resistance to therapy and poor survival. While centriolar overduplication and multipolar spindle formation is one mechanism by which dysregulated Plk4 can facilitate oncogenesis, our laboratory has found that Plk4 promotes migration and invasion of fibroblasts and of cancer cells by mechanisms currently under investigation. Haploid levels of Plk4 are associated with an increased incidence of improper cleavage furrow positioning during mitotic division, and we previously showed that RhoA is not adequately activated to effect proper actomyosin ring placement and contraction in Plk4 heterozygous murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). We showed that the effect of Plk4 on RhoA activation is mediated by phosphorylation of the GEF Ect2 by Plk4 (Rosario et al., PNAS 2010). The small Rho GTPases RhoA, Rac1 and Cdc42 are known to regulate cell motility. We hypothesize that Plk4 promotes cancer cell motility by altering the activation of one or more of these RhoGTPases. Methods and Results: Pulldown experiments have shown a two-fold reduction in activated Rac1 in Plk4+/− as compared to Plk4+/+ MEFs. Depletion of Plk4 from wildtype MEFs using siPlk4 (confirmed by real time RT-PCR) reduced levels of activated Rac1, as compared to siLuciferase controls. Cdc42 activation was unaffected by Plk4. To determine the mechanism of the effect of Plk4 on Rho GTPase activation we investigated the upstream regulators that may be affected by Plk4, aside from Ect2. We scanned a library of 149 GEFs and GAPs cloned into the Creator system and identified 8 potential interactors (all GEFs) that contain the Plk4 consensus phosphorylation motif. We are evaluating these 8 candidates for physical interaction with Plk4 by co-transfection and co-immunoprecipitation from HeLa cells. By this method, we find that Plk4 physically interacts with the RhoA GEF ARHGEF1. To establish functional validation of this interaction, we are examining the phenotype of individually- and co- transfected HeLa cells. Transient transfection with Plk4 for 24h results in an arborized phenotype, while transfection with ARHGEF1 results in a rounded morphology; co-transfected cells display an intermediate phenotype. Immunofluorescence imaging shows co-localization of Flag-Plk4 and GFP-ARHGEF1 in lamellipodia, in keeping with a potential functional interaction. Whether the effect of ARHGEF1 on cell morphology is mediated through Rac1, RhoA, or both requires further investigation, as does the precise role of Plk4. Conclusions: Plk4 regulates the activation of Rac1 GTPase, and we demonstrate a physical and functional interaction of Plk4 with the Rac1 GEF ARHGEF1. Regulation of cancer cell motility via this pathway may contribute to promotion of invasion and metastasis by Plk4. Citation Format: Volha (Olga) Brashavitskaya, Karineh Kazazian, Rick Bagshaw, Carla O. Rosario, Francis S W Zih, Yosr Haffani, James W. Dennis, Tony J. Pawson, Carol J. Swallow. RhoGTPase-based regulation of cell motility by Plk4. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2324. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-2324

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics→French-language works237,207→