MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011085401 · doi:10.2166/wst.2008.815

Eutrophication of agricultural streams: defining nutrient concentrations to protect ecological condition

2008· article· en· W2011085401 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Science & Technology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of New BrunswickParks CanadaEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEutrophicationNutrientSTREAMSAgricultureEnvironmental sciencePhosphorusEcologyAbundance (ecology)Aquatic ecosystemEnvironmental protectionWater resource managementBiologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inputs of nutrients (phosphorus, P, and nitrogen, N) to coastal and fresh waters can accelerate eutrophication, resulting in excessive aquatic plant growth, depletion of oxygen, and deleterious changes in abundance and diversity of organisms. Using long-term (approximately 1995-2005) monitoring data from agriculturally-dominated watersheds in southern Ontario and Quebec, Canada, we developed and tested several approaches for setting targets for N and P. Our research showed that it is possible to set scientifically-credible targets for total P and total N to protect ecological condition of streams in agricultural landscapes, and define achievable targets attainable following adoption of beneficial management practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it