MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011103824 · doi:10.1117/12.706549

Using fluorescence to augment the efficacy of photodynamic therapy

2006· article· en· W2011103824 on OpenAlexaff
Dwayne J. Dickey, Weiyang Liu, Selvaraj Naicker, Thomas Woo, Ronald B. Moore, J. Tulip

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaQuest University Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotosensitizerPhotodynamic therapySinglet oxygenFluorescenceBiodistributionIrradiationPhotochemistryChemistryBiophysicsBiomedical engineeringMaterials scienceOxygenOpticsMedicineIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) is a relatively novel oncological treatment modality, in which a patient is administered a photosensitive drug, called a photosensitizer. After allowing sufficient time for biodistribution, the cancerous area is irradiated with light of the appropriate wavelength, activating the photosensitizer to produce highly reactive singlet oxygen, which produces a highly localized cell kill. The efficacy of PDT is determined by a) the intensity of the light b) the local concentration of the photosensitizer, and c) the availability of oxygen. However, with the clinical application of PDT, the patient is simply administered a body mass dependent quantity of photosensitizer, and then the target area is administered a prescribed amount of radiant energy (joules per cubic centimetre). For treatment of superficial malignancies, PDT has many successes; however, interstitial PDT (PDT of solid, internal malignancies) has inconsistent outcomes mostly due to the inability to predict, calculate or measure the variables that affect PDT: the radiation dose, oxygen concentration, and the photosensitizer concentration. We have developed sophisticated methods to determine the behaviour of light in homogeneous biological tissues. Tissue oxygen levels can be replenished by fractionating the light dose - allowing areas of your target tissue to go through a "dark" cycle during PDT. However, to date, there has not been an accurate method of determining tissue photosensitizer concentrations in-vivo. We are researching the efficacy of a novel hypocrellin derivative, SL-052. Like other photosensitizers available, SL-052 shows strong therapeutic photodynamic activity when irradiated by 635 nm light. Like most photosensitizers, SL-052 exhibits fluorescent activity, but SL-052 also shows strong fluorescent emission at 725nm when excited by 635 nm. The intensity of the fluorescent emission can been correlated with the local concentration of the photosenstizer. However, many clinically available photosensitizers require that fluorescence is excited using a wavelength of light much shorter than the therapeutic wavelength. This characteristic allows us to monitor the availability of the photosensitizer during PDT and to correlate the outcome of PDT to the observed fluorescence. In this paper, we monitor the temporal distribution of SL-052 in the Dunning R3327-AT cell line grown on the flank of a Fisher Copenhangen rats.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.862

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207