MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011123241 · doi:10.1139/v07-058

Structures of the 2:1 adducts of benzyne with 2-methylanisole and benzene

2007· article· en· W2011123241 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Christopher O. Bender, Renè T. Boeré, Peter W. Dibble, Ryan T. McKay

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCyclization and Aryne Chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsChemistryAdductCyclopropaneFluoreneAryneCrystallographyCrystal structureStereochemistryBenzeneBond lengthFuranNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyRing (chemistry)Medicinal chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2:1 adduct of benzyne with 2-methylanisole is shown to have the bisbenzotricyclic structure 6,6a,11,11a-tetrahydro-5-methoxy-6-methyl-5,6,11-metheno-5H-benzo[a]fluorene by a single-crystal X-ray diffraction study (C20H18O: Pca21, a = 15.0497(17), b = 9.87783(11), c = 9.6846(11); Z = 4; 1672 data points, R1 = 0.0325). This structure is compared to an unpublished crystal structure of the parent hydrocarbon 6,6a,11,11a-tetrahydro-5,6,11-metheno-5H-benzo[a]fluorene, C18H14. Both structures have also been computed by DFT methods at the B3LYP/6-311(d,p) level of theory. Bond distances and angles between the solid-state measurements and gas-phase calculations are found to agree well; average deviations are well below 1%. The 1H NMR spectra show surprisingly small 3JHH couplings in the central tricyclic cage, but can be assigned using 2D spectroscopy.Key words: Hydrocarbon cages, strained rings, cyclopropane, X-ray crystallography, NMR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicCyclization and Aryne ChemistryFrench-language works237,207