MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011127117 · doi:10.1017/s0021859609008442

Application of the law of diminishing returns to estimate maintenance requirement for amino acids and their efficiency of utilization for accretion in young chicks

2009· article· en· W2011127117 on OpenAlexaff
H. Darmani Kuhi, E. Kebreab, Secundino López, J. France

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Agricultural Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of ManitobaCanadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParameterized complexityEnergy requirementMathematicsAmino acidValineLinear regressionThreonineEnergy balanceAnimal scienceAccretion (finance)Regression analysisRegressionRange (aeronautics)LysineConsistency (knowledge bases)Environmental scienceStatisticsChemistryBiologyBiochemistryMaterials sciencePhysicsEcologyAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY Suitability of the monomolecular equation, specifically re-parameterized for analysing energy balance data, has recently been investigated in broilers and turkeys. In the current study, this equation was applied to literature data from growing chicks fed crystalline amino acid (AA) diets, in order to provide estimates for AA requirements for maintenance, body-weight gain and protein accretion. Non-linear regression was used with the data to estimate parameters and combine them to determine other biological indicators. The predictive ability of the model was evaluated with reference to model behaviour when fitting the data, biologically meaningful parameter estimates and statistical performance. The model estimated the maintenance requirements for valine, threonine and lysine to be in the range 80–111, 96–109 and 52–209 mg/kg of liveweight/day, respectively, depending on the response criterion. Requirements for maintenance were in good agreement with values reported previously. Average efficiency of recovering AAs in whole body protein, between maintenance and four×maintenance, was in the reported range of 0·80–1·0 and greatest at low intakes and decreasing as intakes increase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207