MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011150521 · doi:10.1115/icone22-30133

On Features of Thermal Design of Passive Evaporation-and-Condensation Systems of Reactor Thermal Shielding

2014· article· en· W2011150521 on OpenAlexaff
A. N. Gershuni, A. P. Nishchik, Eugene Pis’mennyi, V. G. Razumovskiy, Igor Pioro

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectromagnetic shieldingNuclear engineeringCondensationEvaporationThermalDecay heatEngineering design processComputer scienceProcess engineeringMechanical engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringPhysicsThermodynamicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Further development of nuclear engineering is inseparably linked with the requirement of vast application of the passive systems of heat removal running without human intervention. Creation of such systems is impossible, if only conventional engineering solutions are used. As known, to prevent propagation of the fission products into the environment there are three safety barriers. To provide operation of the third safety barrier (containment shell), in particular, of the reactor cavities both in operational and emergency modes a passive evaporation-and-condensation (EC) system of heat removal is proposed. The features of thermal design of the EC systems for thermal shielding of the reactor cavities are considered. They make it possible to determine the optimal main design variables of the EC systems and prove reasonability and efficiency of their application. The performed study validates engineering feasibility of an efficient EC system for thermal shielding of the reactor equipment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studiesFrench-language works237,207