MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011155783 · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001369

Epigenetic Regulation of Cell Type–Specific Expression Patterns in the Human Mammary Epithelium

2011· article· en· W2011155783 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Reo Maruyama, Sibgat Choudhury, Adam Kowalczyk, Marina Bessarabova, Bryan Beresford‐Smith, Thomas Conway, Antony Kaspi, Zhenhua Wu, Tatiana Nikolskaya, Vanessa F. Merino, Pang-Kuo Lo, X. Shirley Liu, Yuri Nikolsky, Saraswati Sukumar, Izhak Haviv, Kornélia Polyák

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS Genetics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Cancer InstituteTerri Brodeur Breast Cancer FoundationCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreBreast Cancer Research FoundationJohns Hopkins UniversityBrigham and Women's HospitalBC Cancer AgencySusan G. Komen for the Cure
KeywordsBiologyEpigeneticsDNA methylationEpigenomicsHistoneEpigenetic regulation of neurogenesisRegulation of gene expressionCellular differentiationCell typeGeneticsGene expressionGene expression profilingCell biologyGeneComputational biologyCell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Differentiation is an epigenetic program that involves the gradual loss of pluripotency and acquisition of cell type-specific features. Understanding these processes requires genome-wide analysis of epigenetic and gene expression profiles, which have been challenging in primary tissue samples due to limited numbers of cells available. Here we describe the application of high-throughput sequencing technology for profiling histone and DNA methylation, as well as gene expression patterns of normal human mammary progenitor-enriched and luminal lineage-committed cells. We observed significant differences in histone H3 lysine 27 tri-methylation (H3K27me3) enrichment and DNA methylation of genes expressed in a cell type-specific manner, suggesting their regulation by epigenetic mechanisms and a dynamic interplay between the two processes that together define developmental potential. The technologies we developed and the epigenetically regulated genes we identified will accelerate the characterization of primary cell epigenomes and the dissection of human mammary epithelial lineage-commitment and luminal differentiation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations102
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS GeneticsSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207