MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011165316 · doi:10.1081/ss-120004457

The effective approach for recovery of methyl-substituted 1,3-dioxane from aqueous media

2002· article· en· W2011165316 on OpenAlexaff
Janusz J. Malinowski, Andrew J. Daugulis

Bibliographic record

VenueSeparation Science and Technology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryAqueous solutionSolventExtraction (chemistry)ExtractorAqueous two-phase systemAqueous medium1,4-DioxaneChromatographyDiolSolvent extractionOrganic chemistryProcess engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The solvent extraction has been successfully applied to the recovery of methyl-substituted 1,3-dioxane from the aqueous reaction media. Aromatic hydrocarbons used as extractants allowed the removal, from the aqueous phase, of up to 75% of dioxane formed in the one stage reactor–extractor. The concept could be included in a downstream separation scheme for the isolation of 1,3-propanediol from a dilute aqueous solution using reversible reaction of the diol with acetalaldehyde.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeparation Science and TechnologySame topicAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyFrench-language works237,207