MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011171826 · doi:10.1021/je000008o

Partitioning of Acidic Solutes between Water and Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. Effect of pH and Ionic Strength

2000· article· en· W2011171826 on OpenAlexaff
Meredith S. Curren, Robert Burk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical & Engineering Data · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIonic strengthChemistryPartition coefficientPentachlorophenolAqueous solutionPhase (matter)HydrolysisActivity coefficientAqueous two-phase systemIonic bondingInorganic chemistryIonAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyEnvironmental chemistryPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Partitioning of pentachlorophenol (PCP) between water and CO 2 was investigated to determine the effects of pH and ionic strength on the value of the distribution coefficient, K . Decreasing the pH or increasing the ionic strength increased the value of K . The distribution coefficient was larger than that predicted by considering the extent of hydrolysis of the solute in the aqueous phase. However, impedance measurements suggest that negligible concentrations of ions exist in the CO 2 phase. Together, these two facts suggest that the aqueous phase hydrolysis equilibrium is shifted toward unhydrolyzed solute as PCP partitions to CO 2 . The value of K was smaller than the ratio of solubilities of the solute in the two phases, likely due to the effect of solute composition on the solute activity coefficients in each phase. Partitioning isotherms are also reported for the solutes pentachlorophenol, 2,3,4,5-tetrachlorophenol and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid at about 40 °C, between about 100 to 270 bar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical & Engineering DataSame topicPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207