MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011216096 · doi:10.1029/2001gl014119

Magnetotelluric imaging of the creeping segment of the San Andreas Fault near Hollister

2002· article· en· W2011216096 on OpenAlexaff
Paul A. Bedrosian, Martyn Unsworth, G. D. Egbert

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetotelluricsGeologySan andreas faultSeismologyInduced seismicityFault (geology)Inversion (geology)TectonicsGeophysicsElectrical resistivity and conductivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fluids may play a significant role in the earthquake rupture process. Since fluids can dramatically change the electrical resistivity of crustal rocks, electromagnetic exploration methods can image in situ fault‐zone fluids. Magnetotelluric (MT) data has been collected on segments of the San Andreas Fault (SAF) in Central California exhibiting a range of seismic behavior from locked to creeping. This paper describes MT data from the creeping segment of the SAF near Hollister, California. Inversion models image a zone of enhanced conductivity beneath the surface trace of the SAF that has similar geometry and greater depth extent than the fault zone conductor at Parkfield. Comparison with geologic and seismic tomographic studies show this zone is bounded by the San Andreas and Calaveras Faults, and coincident with a zone of low seismic P‐wave velocities. Combined with previous MT studies, this indicates a correlation between seismicity and the presence of fault‐zone fluids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207