MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2011238836 · doi:10.1353/utq.0.0094

Canadian Methodist Women, 1766–1925: Marys, Marthas, Mothers in Israel (review)

2008· article· en· W2011238836 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Myra Rutherdale

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethodismPrayerHistorySacrificeProtestantismReligious studiesNarrativeGender studiesReading (process)State (computer science)SociologyArtLawLiteraturePolitical sciencePhilosophyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Canadian Methodist Women, 1766–1925: Marys, Marthas, Mothers in Israel Myra Rutherdale Marilyn Färdig Whiteley . Canadian Methodist Women, 1766–1925: Marys, Marthas, Mothers in Israel. Wilfrid Laurier University Press 2005. xi, 306. $49.95 This book is necessary reading for those interested in Canadian women's history and specifically the history of women in social and religious movements. Marilyn Färdig Whitely makes it clear that for the nineteenth century the social and religious were inextricably connected. The result of extensive archival research, Canadian Methodist Women provides both a deep understanding of the pervasiveness of the Methodist Church, and a chronological narrative of women's activism within and beyond the church. Chapters on ministers' wives, Methodism and family life, prayer meetings and revivals, ladies' aid societies, mission wives and missionary women, community outreach work, and Methodism and the social gospel movement, all point to the great extent to which women kept Methodism alive in early Canada. One is reminded of the self-sacrifice made by these women. The tribulations of the itinerants' wives, for example, were well expressed by Emma Jeffers Graham, who noted, 'I possess one good dress made in the fashion, which I wear when I take my daily constitutional. I occasionally [End Page 253] make rich cakes and once a year a very rich one; and on state occasions I frezz my hair.' Such was the care that it took to stretch the budget. Collectively too women worked together for the good of the church. In the spring of 1895, for example, the women in Wiarton, Ontario, joined for their ladies' aid meeting and raised funds collaboratively and creatively: 'One woman baked bread; another canned fruit; some crocheted, or made and sold other fancy work; several gave socials; quite a number raised poultry or vegetables.' Women's work included, among other things, fundraising, teaching Sunday school, making music, holding temperance meetings, and dispensing social service in communities of newcomers and the urban poor. These efforts were widely recognized, and it was clear to church patriarchs that women played an extremely significant role within Methodism. One would be hard pressed to dispute their significance. Women Methodist leaders and activists dating from the late eighteenth century are still well known today. Those who played prominent roles, like Barbara Heck and Eliza Barnes in the early nineteenth century, to women who often became associated with the first-wave feminist movement, like Kathleen Morton, Annie Leake Tuttle, Beatrice Brigden, Louise McKinney, and Nellie McLung, had goals and aspirations that varied widely. Yet one shared objective was to have women's work for the church acknowledged and power officially granted. The campaign for women's ordination would become heated in the first two decades of the twentieth century. One strong expression for the desire of recognition came from Ontario-born Helen Deltour, who catalogued all of the duties women were 'allowed' to carry out, to point to the obvious fact that women did everything but had little 'official' power: 'She may sing in choirs, teach in Sunday schools, do work as an evangelist, lead devotional meetings, be the sexton or occupy the pulpit for the pastor on occasion. She may organize and carry on Ladies' Aid Societies; raise money by teas, bazaars, socials, or voluntary gifts; be a Deaconess, or belong to the Board in connection with Deaconess work. She has the privilege of collecting the missionary money for the general mission fund, but no voice in its disbursement.' Women wanted to be on the General Conference Board and to be ordained. These obstacles would begin to disappear in the 1930s, but it had taken well over a century of hard work. This is not a book that provides a new interpretive framework for analyzing women's role in the nineteenth-century religious world. However, it provides a rich and detailed set of stories and experiences that thankfully span the entire country and strengthen our appreciation for the many roles played to shape Methodism and move women from the private to the public sphere of church life. Marilyn Färdig Whiteley is to be congratulated for her efforts at bringing these Methodist women's stories to light. Myra Rutherdale...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.011
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→