MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011278558 · doi:10.1109/icip.2006.312607

Variational Textured Image Decomposition with Improved Edge Segregation

2006· article· en· W2011278558 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Shahidi, Cecilia Moloney

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInpaintingImage textureArtificial intelligenceMorphological gradientPattern recognition (psychology)PiecewiseComputer visionImage segmentationImage (mathematics)DecompositionMathematicsComputer scienceImage processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Image decomposition consists of splitting an image into two or more components. One component is piecewise smooth and models object shapes. Another component consists of the texture in the image, possibly including some noise. Image decomposition is useful for a host of image processing tasks, e.g. texture segmentation and image inpainting. In this paper, we consider ways of improving both the speed and quality of image decomposition using the basic variational approach of Meyer (2001) by adding extra regularization terms. A measure of quality of image decomposition found in the literature Daubechies, I et al., (2004) is the absence of cartoon edges in the texture component of the decomposition. In this paper, we introduce a method called improved edge segregation image decomposition, which ensures this quality measure is high. When combined with active contour texture discrimination, improved results are obtained over conventional methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207