MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011298021 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2014.6901094

Transformer windings hot spot temperature modeling and simulation

2014· article· en· W2011298021 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Canadian institutionsRed River College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectromagnetic coilTransformerTemperature measurementDistribution transformerRotary variable differential transformerMaterials scienceTransformer oilEnergy efficient transformerDelta-wye transformerTransformer effectTemperature controlCurrent transformerVoltageElectrical engineeringMechanical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents simplified simulation models to determine the winding hot spot temperature of a transformer. The models use measured oil temperature(s), load current and transformer winding data as inputs. The simulated winding hot spot temperature showed good agreement with the temperature measured on 250 MVA transformer equipped with fiber optic probes. The models can be implemented in an on line monitoring system. The determined winding hot spot temperature can be used to assess the insulation ageing, the risk of bubble formation. It is also important for more efficient control of the cooling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it