MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The effectiveness of standard pediatric daycare surgery discharge communication: A quality improvement gap analysis

2011· article· en· W2011304342 on OpenAlex
Jeremy Daniels, Eleanor J. Reimer, Beth Elston, Ellen Balka, Joanne Lim, Elaine S Chow, J. Mark Ansermino

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Communications In Healthcare · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPatient Safety and Medication Errors
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPatient safetyVomitingMedicineHospital dischargeNauseaMedical emergencyQuality (philosophy)Health careIntensive care medicineAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this manuscript is to identify for the reader how communication gaps during handovers from hospital personnel to parents after pediatric day surgery can endanger patient safety. Variables analyzed include parent-reported quality of communication and hospital safety culture, medication safety, surgical wound care, and nausea and vomiting knowledge. Data are obtained via a 21-item questionnaire. The reader is informed of a technique for communication quality measurement that combines naturalistic observation of the discharge process, a theoretical model of discharge communication and safety domain modeling and analysis. The reader is informed via the discharge communication and safety domain model of the areas posing the most risk to patient safety in the post-discharge period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.777

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.242
GPT teacher head0.495
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it