MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011327629 · doi:10.1121/1.4881929

Multichannel filtering and reconstruction of ultrasonic guided wave fields using time intercept-slowness transform

2014· article· en· W2011327629 on OpenAlexafffund
Tho N.H.T. Tran, Lawrence H. Le, Mauricio D. Sacchi, Vu‐Hieu Nguyen, Edmond Lou

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of AlbertaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsRadon transformSlownessAcousticsUltrasonic sensorNondestructive testingAmplitudeComputer scienceMathematicsAlgorithmOpticsMathematical analysisGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multichannel ultrasonic axial-transmission data are multimodal by nature. As guided waves are commonly used in nondestructive material testing, wave field filtering becomes important because the analysis is usually limited to a few lower-order modes and requires their extraction. An application of the Radon transform to enhance signal-to-noise ratio and separate wave fields in ultrasonic records is presented. The method considers guided wave fields as superpositions of plane waves defined by ray parameters (p) and time intercepts (τ) and stacks the amplitudes along linear trajectories, mapping time-offset (t - x) data to a τ - p or Radon panel. The transform is implemented using a least-squares strategy with Cauchy-norm regularization that serves to enhance the focusing power. The method was verified using simulated data and applied to an uneven spatially sampled bovine-bone-plate data set. The results demonstrate the Radon panels show isolated amplitude clusters and the Cauchy-norm constraint provides a more focused Radon image than the damped least-squares regularization. Wave field separation can be achieved by selectively windowing the τ - p signals and inverse transformation, which is illustrated by the successful extraction of the A0 mode in bone plate. In addition, the method effectively attenuates noise, enhances the coherency of the guided wave modes, and reconstructs the missing records. The proposed transform presents a powerful signal-enhancement tool to process guided waves for further analysis and inversion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.692
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave PropagationFrench-language works237,207