MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011331242 · doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2005.10.003

L'homme préhistorique dans le Grand Nord

2005· article· fr· W2011331242 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComptes Rendus Palevol · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesEthnologyGeographyHistoryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La conquête du monde, jusque dans ses limites septentrionales extrêmes et les plus contraignantes, constitue l'une des plus grandes aventures de l'humanité. La colonisation du Grand Nord au cours de la dernière période glaciaire correspond à une avancée des hommes à l'intérieur de territoires aux conditions difficiles, qui stimulèrent leur évolution adaptative et leur potentiel créatif. Ces hommes du froid, pourtant originaires de régions tropicales, réussirent à vivre et à développer, sous des latitudes qui, biologiquement, leur étaient hostiles, les premiers systèmes culturels, symboliques et sociaux clairement identifiables par l'archéologie. Pour citer cet article : P. Plumet, C. R. Palevol 5 (2006). The prehistoric Man in the Far North. The conquest of the Earth up to its furthest northern and constraining limits is one of the most challenging human ventures. The colonization of the Far North, during the Last Glacial time, corresponds to the penetration by mankind into territories where environmental conditions were particularly harsh. But these very conditions stimulated its adaptability and its creativity. Although these Men of the Cold originated from tropical regions, they succeeded not only to live in latitudes which were biologically hostile, but also to set up the first cultural, symbolic, and social systems, clearly recognizable by archaeology. To cite this article: P. Plumet, C. R. Palevol 5 (2006).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.631
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it