Bibliographic record
Abstract
La conquête du monde, jusque dans ses limites septentrionales extrêmes et les plus contraignantes, constitue l'une des plus grandes aventures de l'humanité. La colonisation du Grand Nord au cours de la dernière période glaciaire correspond à une avancée des hommes à l'intérieur de territoires aux conditions difficiles, qui stimulèrent leur évolution adaptative et leur potentiel créatif. Ces hommes du froid, pourtant originaires de régions tropicales, réussirent à vivre et à développer, sous des latitudes qui, biologiquement, leur étaient hostiles, les premiers systèmes culturels, symboliques et sociaux clairement identifiables par l'archéologie. Pour citer cet article : P. Plumet, C. R. Palevol 5 (2006). The prehistoric Man in the Far North. The conquest of the Earth up to its furthest northern and constraining limits is one of the most challenging human ventures. The colonization of the Far North, during the Last Glacial time, corresponds to the penetration by mankind into territories where environmental conditions were particularly harsh. But these very conditions stimulated its adaptability and its creativity. Although these Men of the Cold originated from tropical regions, they succeeded not only to live in latitudes which were biologically hostile, but also to set up the first cultural, symbolic, and social systems, clearly recognizable by archaeology. To cite this article: P. Plumet, C. R. Palevol 5 (2006).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".