MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011364483 · doi:10.1002/mop.24125

A novel butterfly‐shaped monopole UWB antenna

2009· article· en· W2011364483 on OpenAlexaff
Qiubo Ye, Zhi Ning Chen, Terence S. P. See

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonopole antennaMicrowaveImpedance matchingUltra-widebandBandwidth (computing)Dipole antennaAntenna (radio)ButterflyElectrical engineeringEngineeringElectrical impedanceMagnetic monopoleRadiation patternWidebandRadiationAcousticsPhysicsElectronic engineeringOpticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The proposed butterfly‐shaped monopole ultra‐wideband (UWB) antenna consists of two radiating elements (wings) positioned with an angle between them, which provides one more dimension for impedance matching. The simulated and measured results show that the design achieves a broad impedance bandwidth and stable radiation performance over the UWB band. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 51: 590–593, 2009; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/mop.24125

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.515
Threshold uncertainty score0.735

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrowave and Optical Technology LettersSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207