MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011399220 · doi:10.1097/sap.0b013e31815f66e5

First Carpal-Metacarpal Joint Dislocation and Trapezial Fracture Treated With External Fixation in an Adolescent

2008· article· en· W2011399220 on OpenAlexaff
Wendy L. Parker, Marcin Czerwiński, Chen Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Plastic Surgery · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFixation (population genetics)Reduction (mathematics)Range of motionJoint stabilitySoft tissueRadiographySurgeryOrthodonticsPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The intrinsic joint stability of the first carpal-metacarpal joint (CMC) makes dislocation a rare injury with fewer than 40 cases described. The degree to which supporting ligaments have been disrupted is reflected clinically by a spectrum of joint stability. Close review of radiographs and an attentive physical examination are necessary to make the diagnosis. Acute treatment has consisted of closed or open reduction with K-wires for stabilization or casting with failures leading to chronic joint instability and the need for soft tissue tendon suspension to maintain joint alignment. We present the case of a 12-year-old boy with a complete first CMC dislocation and trapezial fracture treated with closed reduction and external fixation. At a 3-year follow-up, our patient demonstrates excellent range of motion, strength, and no joint instability without functional limitations. We suggest that external fixation be added to the armamentarium for managing these difficult injuries especially in the pediatric population where interference with growth plates is not ideal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Plastic SurgerySame topicOrthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207