MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011399220 · doi:10.1097/sap.0b013e31815f66e5

First Carpal-Metacarpal Joint Dislocation and Trapezial Fracture Treated With External Fixation in an Adolescent

2008· article· en· W2011399220 on OpenAlexaff
Wendy L. Parker, Marcin Czerwiński, Chen Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Plastic Surgery · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFixation (population genetics)Reduction (mathematics)Range of motionJoint stabilitySoft tissueRadiographySurgeryOrthodonticsPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The intrinsic joint stability of the first carpal-metacarpal joint (CMC) makes dislocation a rare injury with fewer than 40 cases described. The degree to which supporting ligaments have been disrupted is reflected clinically by a spectrum of joint stability. Close review of radiographs and an attentive physical examination are necessary to make the diagnosis. Acute treatment has consisted of closed or open reduction with K-wires for stabilization or casting with failures leading to chronic joint instability and the need for soft tissue tendon suspension to maintain joint alignment. We present the case of a 12-year-old boy with a complete first CMC dislocation and trapezial fracture treated with closed reduction and external fixation. At a 3-year follow-up, our patient demonstrates excellent range of motion, strength, and no joint instability without functional limitations. We suggest that external fixation be added to the armamentarium for managing these difficult injuries especially in the pediatric population where interference with growth plates is not ideal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Plastic SurgerySame topicOrthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207