A model for time to fracture with a shock stream superimposed on progressive degradation: the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Osteoporotic hip fractures in the elderly are associated with a high mortality in the first year following fracture and a high incidence of disability among survivors. We study first and second fractures of elderly women using data from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. We present a new conceptual framework, stochastic model, and statistical methodology for time to fracture. Our approach gives additional insights into the patterns for first and second fractures and the concomitant risk factors. Our modeling perspective involves a novel time-to-event methodology called threshold regression, which is based on the plausible idea that many events occur when an underlying process describing the health or condition of a person or system encounters a critical boundary or threshold for the first time. In the parlance of stochastic processes, this time to event is a first hitting time of the threshold. The underlying process in our model is a composite of a chronic degradation process for skeletal health combined with a random stream of shocks from external traumas, which taken together trigger fracture events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".