MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011444769 · doi:10.2118/59330-ms

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Advanced Image Analysis as a Tool to Extract Mass Transfer Information from a 2D Physical Model of the Vapex Process

2000· article· en· W2011444769 on OpenAlexaff
D. Fisher, A.K. Singhal, Swapan K. Das, Jon Goldman, Carney Jackson

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNMR spectroscopy and applications
Canadian institutionsSuncor Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)Mass transferParametric statisticsPosition (finance)MechanicsEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionComputer sciencePoint (geometry)Materials sciencePhysicsArtificial intelligenceMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Vapor Extraction process (Vapex) is one of the few options for the recovery of huge resources available in the form of highly viscous heavy oil and bitumen. Vaporized hydrocarbon solvents are used to reduce the bitumen viscosity, which then moves towards the production well by gravity drainage. IOR processes such as Vapex, have been difficult to study in the laboratory in any sort of quantitative way. The reason for this is that much of the information needed to get estimates of the mass transfer process is contained in the concentration gradients around the edge of the vapor chamber. Conventional 2D visual models provide information only about the position of the vapor chamber and its advance. The use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) as a tool to observe the movement of the vapor chamber not only includes its position but also gives useful information about the concentration gradients along the leading edge. Not only are the gradients measured, but the information is inherently 2D and, as such, with an appropriate mathematical model, a parametric description of the magnitude of the mass transfer can be defined in both the horizontal and vertical directions. The use of phenomenological mathematical models in image analysis to describe the concentration gradient in functional terms allows the investigator to extract a great deal of parametric information from each experiment. This information includes enough spatial resolution to confirm that the movement of a point on the vapor chamber wall occurs in steps while at the same time, the width of the dispersion zone (where gas has diffused into the oil) increases before each step. These results have been obtained from a sand pack model saturated with Athabasca bitumen and propane as the solvent gas. An analysis of two of these experiments (one dry sand and the other water saturated sand) has provided enough quantitative information to give solid support to the standard two step model of the Vapex process. The gas must first diffuse into the bitumen for some time to reduce the viscosity of the oil/gas mixture sufficiently so that in the second step the gravitational forces can overcome the capillary forces and allow the oil to drain down the vapor chamber wall. Additional information about the relative effect of connate water supports the observations that the process is faster when connate water is present. The role of asphaltene precipitation was observed but not quantified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score0.690

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery SymposiumSame topicNMR spectroscopy and applicationsFrench-language works237,207