MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Regulation of the Metastatic Process by E‐Selectin and Stress‐Activated Protein Kinase‐2/p38

2002· review· en· W2011457604 on OpenAlexaff
Julie Laferrière, François Houle, Jacques Huot

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalHôtel-Dieu de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtravasationCancer cellAngiogenesisMetastasisCancerCancer researchMedicineCell biologyBiologyPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The formation of metastasis is a dreadful complication of cancer that is associated with a poor prognosis. Several clinical observations and experimental findings indicate that the metastatic process is nonrandom and involves a sequence of multistep events that may all be targeted for therapy. This includes angiogenesis of the primary neoplasm, release of malignant cells from this neoplasm, entry of cancer cells into the blood circulation, interaction of cancer cells with vascular endothelial cells in distant organs, and growth of blood-borne cancer cells locally in the vessels or distally following extravasation. Our working hypothesis is that metastatic cancer cells exploit the mechanisms of the inflammation process to successfully migrate into distant organs. This implies a pivotal role for specific adhesive interactions between cancer cells and vascular endothelial cells and activation of migratory pathways in the cancer cells. We review here the roles played by the endothelial adhesive molecule E-selectin and by the motogenic stress-activated protein kinase-2 (SAPK2/p38) pathway of cancer cells in modulating transendothelial migration of cancer cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the New York Academy of SciencesSame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207