MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011479343 · doi:10.1186/cc14043

Effects of splenectomy and GTS-21, a selective α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist, on the development of septic ileus in mice

2014· article· en· W2011479343 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sara Nullens, JG De Man, P.A. Pelckmans, Benedicte Y. De Winter

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChildren's Health FoundationConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa CatarinaFinanciadora de Estudos e ProjetosCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchLondon Health Sciences Centre
KeywordsMedicineAgonistSepsisIleusInflammationPharmacologyAcetylcholineCholinergicSystemic inflammationImmunologyReceptorInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sepsis remains a leading cause of mortality in our ICUs. Ileus, defined as the inhibition of the propulsive motility in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, together with mucosal barrier dysfunction will maintain sepsis by the translocation of intestinal bacteria. Preliminary data in our group showed that the administration of GTS-21, a selective alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7nAChR) agonist, ameliorates inflammation and GI motility disturbances during sepsis [ 1 ]. Activation of the α7nAChR is the final step in the vagal anti-inflammatory pathway, a spleen-dependent and macrophage-dependent pathway that dampens inflammation. We aimed to study the effects of splenectomy (SPLX) combined with GTS-21 on GI motility and on local colonic and systemic inflammation, as the role of the spleen in the vagal anti-inflammatory pathway is currently under debate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical CareSame topicVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchFrench-language works237,207