Venlafaxine extended release (XR) in the treatment of panic disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Panic disorder is a chronic, recurrent illness, with a lifetime prevalence of about 5%. It is associated with substantial functional impairment, and studies suggest that treatment with medication alone (and no instruction in exposure to feared and avoided situations) is less than optimal. In fact, 40%-90% of patients in long-term follow-up studies in the late 1980s and early 1990s, treated with antidepressants or high potency benzodiazepines alone, remained somewhat symptomatic. Venlafaxine extended release (XR) was effective and well tolerated in both the short-term and long-term treatment of panic disorder. In 12-week trials, venlafaxine XR was significantly more effective than placebo in achieving a panic-free state (54%-70% vs 34%-48%, p</=0.05), and was as effective as paroxetine. In addition, venlafaxine XR has been shown to produce significantly higher response and remission rates than placebo. Relapse rates were significantly reduced with ongoing venlafaxine XR treatment compared to switching to placebo (22% vs 50%, p</=0.001), in a 6 month study. Importantly, venlafaxine XR significantly improved patient quality of life and functioning, and was generally well tolerated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".