MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011511663 · doi:10.1080/03610926.2013.799694

Bayesian Statistical Inference For Laplacian Class of Matrix Variate Elliptically Contoured Models

2014· article· en· W2011511663 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersShahrood University of Technology
KeywordsRandom variateInferenceMathematicsContext (archaeology)Bayesian inferenceMatrix (chemical analysis)Bayesian probabilityStatistical inferenceApplied mathematicsStatisticsEconometricsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceRandom variableGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the context of a subclass of matrix variate elliptically contoured (MEC) models, namely Laplacian MEC, with location vector and dispersion matrix , where both are unknown, Bayesian inference is considered through vague prior knowledge firstly. At the second step, an informative prior is incorporated to derive posterior distributions of and . Afterward, the main result is thoroughly considered for matrix variate Student’s t-model and thus generalizing the result of Arnold Zellner (Zellner, 1976 Zellner, A. (1976). Bayesian and non-Bayesian analysis of the regression model with multivariate Student-t error terms. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 71(354): 400–405.[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.501
Teacher spread0.401 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it