Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Let $g = \sum c(D)q^D$ and $f=\sum a_n q^n$ be modular forms of half-integral weight k +1/2 and integral weight 2 k respectively that are associated to each other under the Shimura–Kohnen correspondence. For suitable fundamental discriminants D , a theorem of Waldspurger relates the coefficient c ( D ) to the central critical value L ( f , D , k ) of the Hecke L -series of f twisted by the quadratic Dirichlet character of conductor D . This paper establishes a similar kind of relationship for central critical derivatives in the special case k =1, where f is of weight 2. The role of c ( D ) in our main theorem is played by the first derivative in the weight direction of the D th Fourier coefficient of a p -adic family of half-integral weight modular forms. This family arises naturally, and is related under the Shimura correspondence to the Hida family interpolating f in weight 2. The proof of our main theorem rests on a variant of the Gross–Kohnen–Zagier formula for Stark–Heegner points attached to real quadratic fields, which may be of some independent interest. We also formulate a more general conjectural formula of Gross–Kohnen–Zagier type for Stark–Heegner points, and present numerical evidence for it in settings that seem inaccessible to our methods of proof based on p -adic deformations of modular forms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".