MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011536815 · doi:10.1063/1.3491216

Effect of the gate electrode on the response of organic electrochemical transistors

2010· article· en· W2011536815 on OpenAlexaff
Giuseppe Tarabella, Clara Santato, Sang Yoon Yang, Salvatore Iannotta, George G. Malliaras, Fabio Cicoira

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioelectronicsElectrodeMaterials scienceConductive polymerTransistorOptoelectronicsElectrochemistryNanotechnologyBiosensorElectrolytePolymerChemistryElectrical engineeringVoltageEngineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Organic electrochemical transistors (OECTs) are attracting a great deal of interest for biosensing and bioelectronics applications. However, their device physics is not yet well-understood. In this paper, we focus on the effect of the gate electrode material on the response of OECTs. We studied OECTs made from the conducting polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) doped with poly(styrene sulfonate), and which utilized halide electrolytes. We demonstrate that OECTs with Ag gate electrodes show larger current modulation compared to OECTs with Pt gate electrodes. This effect is due to a change in the OECT regime of operation from capacitive, in case of a Pt gate electrode, to Faradaic, in the case of an Ag electrode.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations167
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicConducting polymers and applicationsFrench-language works237,207