Variation in timing of bud-burst of<i>Ulmus minor</i>clones from different geographical origins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The vegetative bud-burst phenology of field elm (Ulmus minor Mill.) clones originating from a large geographical range within the species natural area was studied at three European sites over a 5-year period in ex situ collections constituted for the conservation of elm genetic resources. At all the sites and in all the years of study, the date of bud burst and the required thermal time to bud burst were directly related to latitude and altitude of origin of the clones. Nevertheless, the differences among origins were reduced with increasing the chilling duration, suggesting that the clones from more northern latitudes and higher altitudes required longer chilling for dormancy release. Analyses of variance performed on selected groups of clones from different latitudinal origins showed that the order of bud burst was stable among years and that the thermal time requirements decreased in all the groups with increasing chilling, with significant differences among groups; southern clones satisfied their chilling requirements after a shorter chilling duration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".