TF-<i>μ</i><sup>+</sup>SR in overdoped Tl<sub>2</sub>Ba<sub>2</sub>CuO<sub>6+<i>x</i></sub>: simplicity still elusive
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Encouraged by predictions of simple Fermi liquid behavior in the overdoped versions of high temperature superconductors (H T c SC) based on CuO 2 planes, we have performed TF- μ + SR experiments on several high quality oriented crystal mosaics of Tl 2 Ba 2 CuO 6+ x ("Tl-2201") in the vortex-lattice state where the magnetic penetration depth λ can be extracted from the characteristic superconducting (SC) lineshape by χ 2 -minimization fitting in the time domain. The results show evidence for a surprising degree of disorder, causing some "smearing" of the characteristic lineshape features, but we were able to extract λ as a function of temperature, revealing a remarkably consistent T -dependence of the SC carrier density n s ∝ λ −2 that suggests this "role-model cuprate" is anything but "simple". The extracted superfluid density for all dopings exhibits a clear inflection point with temperature, suggesting a vortex lattice transition. Such a transition would have important implications for other measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".