MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011590126 · doi:10.1089/jamp.2011.0923

Cystic Fibrosis: The Role of the Small Airways

2012· review· en· W2011590126 on OpenAlexaff
Félix Ratjen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCystic fibrosisAirwayMedicineSmall airwaysLungMucusPathologyLung functionInternal medicineBiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cystic fibrosis (CF) infants are born with normal airway anatomy, and dilatation of mucus glands in smaller airways has been described as the earliest histological changes in the lung of patients. This and other evidence has led to the concept that the small airways may be the region demonstrating initial pathology. Studies clarifying this have been challenged by the lack of a clear definition of what constitutes "small airways" and the difficulties to find accurate measures to quantify and track abnormalities in this region of the lung. Dynamic lung function test are not ideally suited to capture small airway abnormalities as the overall surface area of the small airways is about 40 times greater than that of central airways. Measures that are linked to airway size therefore often fail to capture abnormalities in a disease such as cystic fibrosis that is unevenly distributed throughout the lung. This review summarizes our current understanding of the role of small airways in disease development in cystic fibrosis patients and describes the spectrum of diagnostic tools available to diagnose and follow small airway disease and highlight the opportunities as well as challenges of targeting small airways via aerosol therapy in CF patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug DeliverySame topicCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207