Cystic Fibrosis: The Role of the Small Airways
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cystic fibrosis (CF) infants are born with normal airway anatomy, and dilatation of mucus glands in smaller airways has been described as the earliest histological changes in the lung of patients. This and other evidence has led to the concept that the small airways may be the region demonstrating initial pathology. Studies clarifying this have been challenged by the lack of a clear definition of what constitutes "small airways" and the difficulties to find accurate measures to quantify and track abnormalities in this region of the lung. Dynamic lung function test are not ideally suited to capture small airway abnormalities as the overall surface area of the small airways is about 40 times greater than that of central airways. Measures that are linked to airway size therefore often fail to capture abnormalities in a disease such as cystic fibrosis that is unevenly distributed throughout the lung. This review summarizes our current understanding of the role of small airways in disease development in cystic fibrosis patients and describes the spectrum of diagnostic tools available to diagnose and follow small airway disease and highlight the opportunities as well as challenges of targeting small airways via aerosol therapy in CF patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it