Mycophenolate Mofetil-related Gastrointestinal Mucosal Injury: Variable Injury Patterns, Including Graft-versus-Host Disease-like Changes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a commonly used immunosuppressive drug used in the management of transplant recipients. Although gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity is a known complication of MMF, the literature characterizing the pathologic features of MMF in the GI tract is sparse. This study characterizes the pathologic features of MMF toxicity in both the upper and lower GI tract, correlating it with clinical and endoscopic findings. Seventy-five GI biopsies (9 esophageal, 15 gastric, 16 duodenal, 5 ileal, 30 colonic) from 46 transplant recipients from 2002 to 2006 were obtained and assessed for multiple histologic features. Clinical features were recorded for all cases and endoscopic findings. Only MMF patients showed ulcerative esophagitis (5/7 cases) and reactive gastropathy (4/10 cases). Only MMF patients showed graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-like features in duodenal (4/12 cases) and ileal (1/5 cases) biopsies. GVHD-like changes were seen more frequently among patients on MMF compared with those not on MMF [9 (56%) vs. 2 (14%); P=0.017]. Crypt architectural disarray [12 (75%) vs. 2 (14%); P=0.001], lamina propria edema [9 (56%) vs. 2 (14%); P=0.017], increased lamina propria inflammation [13 (81%) vs. 3 (21%); P=0.001], dilated damaged crypts [7 (44%) vs. 1 (7%); P=0.024], and increased crypt epithelial apoptosis [9 (56%) vs. 2 (14%); P=0.017] were more common with MMF patients compared with non-MMF patients. In conclusion, pathologists should be aware of the potential manifestations of MMF toxicity throughout the GI tract, including ulcerative esophagitis, reactive gastropathy, and GVHD-like features in intestinal biopsies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".