<i>In vitro</i> pattern‐related effects of forskolin on melanophore adrenoceptor‐mediated responses of winter flounder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In vitro experiments were performed on melanophores on scales carrying small slips of skin (scale slips) sampled from the white spot, dark band and general background components of patterning in winter flounder Pseudopleuronectes americanus. In vitro, forskolin (10−4 to 10−7 M) was employed to increase melanophore intracellular cytosolic adenosine‐3′‐5′‐monophosphate (cAMP) levels by stimulating adenylate cyclase. Such increase shifted noradrenaline concentration‐response curves to the right, general background melanophores being least sensitive to the forskolin, indicating a relatively higher proportion of α2‐adrenoceptors, and those from white spots the most sensitive. Melanosome dispersion, in balanced salt solution, was also enhanced by such raised levels of cAMP. Without forskolin, melanophores from white spots displayed the shortest pigment dispersion time in balanced salt solution, the slower melanophores from the other pattern components being those most affected by the addition of forskolin. The results demonstrate that differences in melanophore physiological responsiveness associated with flatfish patterns involve differential intracellular levels of cAMP, as well as differences in melanophore size and rates of melanosome movement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".