Anita M. Myers Program Evaluation for Exercise Leaders. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1999.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RÉSUMÉ Program Evaluation for Exercise Leaders constitue une ressource précieuse pour les moniteurs d'éducation physique qui ont besoin deprendre des décisions éclairées en regard du marché actuel. Le textes' applique aux clients âgés et fragiles de l'industrie du conditionnement physique et du secteur des services de récréation. On y trouve neuf exemples démontrant l'utilité de l'évaluation des programmes à l'égard d'une clientèle diversifiée. Au chapitre des forces de ce livre, citons son approche pratique échelonnée, ses illustrations, ses feuilles de travail qui contribuent à retenir l'attention du lecteur et enfin, l'inclusion de questions de sondage et d'instruments de qualité de vie. Le livre s'avère une ressource précieuse pour ceux qui dirigent des programmes d'exercice ou qui en ont la responsabilité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it