Experimental Investigation on the Modal Characteristics of Rolling Thick Disk
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analytical and experimental investigations are carried out to study the combined effect of rotation and support non-uniformity on the modal characteristics of circular thick disks. A three-dimensional model is implemented to study the coupled in-plane and out-of-plane modes of a thick disk and present the variations of the travelling waves with respect to rotating and fixed coordinates. The initial stiffening due to rotation is introduced by developing a non-linear model that permits the coupling between static and dynamic problems. The present formulation is generalized to account for the stiffening effects for disks subject to non-uniform boundary conditions, where the initial displacement cannot be considered as axisymmetric. The general non-linear problem of a rotating annular disk subject to non-uniform boundary conditions is, then, investigated. The laboratory experiments on stationary and rotating circular disks under selected boundary conditions are carried out to demonstrate the validity of the analytical methods in terms of vibration and acoustic emission behaviour. The experimental results examine the combined effect of rotation and point support on the disk. The experimental study confirms the split in natural frequencies of the disk that was observed in the analytical results due to both rotation and support non-uniformity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".