MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011779200 · doi:10.1300/j134v08n02_03

“Every Peasant Girl Knows How to Sweep!”: Sweeping Women Workers in Hefei, China

2004· article· en· W2011779200 on OpenAlexaff
Deirdre Mary Smythe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Poverty · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaPeasantFunctional illiteracyCognitive reframingEconomic growthChristian ministryPolitical scienceIndigenousGirlGender studiesSocioeconomicsQualitative researchPublic administrationSociologySocial sciencePsychologyLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is a qualitative study investigating the working lives of twenty-six Chinese sweeping women workers in Hefei, Anhui Province, in the P. R. of China. Most participants were illiterate peasant women called nongmingong, migrants from the Chinese countryside. The study's methodology was a project called reframing suggested by Tuhiwai-Smith (1999), used for researching indigenous populations. The sweeping workers suggested that illiteracy was at the root of their employment problems. Policy and taxation reform initiatives by the All-China Women's Federation (ACWF) and the Ministry of Education in the Chinese Party of China Central Committee addressing the formal and informal educational needs of poor women nongmingong are recommended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0150.007
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PovertySame topicChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207