Variable selection and estimation in generalized linear models with the seamless ${\it L}_{{\rm 0}}$ penalty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, we propose variable selection and estimation in generalized linear models using the seamless $L_0$ (SELO) penalized likelihood approach. The SELO penalty is a smooth function that very closely resembles the discontinuous $L_0$ penalty. We develop an efficient algorithm to fit the model, and show that the SELO‐GLM procedure has the oracle property in the presence of a diverging number of variables. We propose a Bayesian information criterion (BIC) to select the tuning parameter. We show that under some regularity conditions, the proposed SELO‐GLM/BIC procedure consistently selects the true model. We perform simulation studies to evaluate the finite sample performance of the proposed methods. Our simulation studies show that the proposed SELO‐GLM procedure has a better finite sample performance than several existing methods, especially when the number of variables is large and the signals are weak. We apply the SELO‐GLM to analyze a breast cancer genetic dataset to identify the SNPs that are associated with breast cancer risk. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 40: 745–769; 2012 © 2012 Statistical Society of Canada
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.033 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".