MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011827162 · doi:10.1145/1865875.1865883

PicOS tuples

2010· article· en· W2011827162 on OpenAlex
Benny Shimony, Ioanis Nikolaidis, Paweł Gburzyński, Eleni Stroulia

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTupleMathematicsDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The task of programming sensor-based systems comes with severe constraints on the resources, typically memory, CPU power, and energy. The challenge is usually addressed with techniques that result in poor code understandability and maintainability. In this paper, we report on a data centric language extension based on a tuple-space abstraction, akin to Linda [2], applied to PicOS [5], a programming environment for wireless sensor networks (WSN's). The extension improves state and context management in a multi-tasking environment suffering from severe memory limitations. The solution integrates tuple operations into the model -- for networking, event handling, and thread contexts. We demonstrate how tuple constructs improve coding and reduce code overhead. We also show how thread's context-tuples can be used as interface arguments for extension by modular aspect constructs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it