MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011855498 · doi:10.5539/esr.v1n2p291

Nonmetal and No Diameter Damage Borehole Wall Strengthening Technology

2012· article· en· W2011855498 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEarth Science Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeomechanics and Mining Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoreholeCasingDrillingDrilling fluidProcess (computing)GeologyNonmetalSimple (philosophy)Petroleum engineeringMechanical engineeringGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringMaterials scienceComputer scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Instability of borehole wall is a common phenomenon when drilling in complex strata, which bring great difficulties to drilling. Traditional way of casing pipe can isolate unstable borehole wall reliably, however, there are some shortcomings: for example, reducing hole-diameter etc. In order to seek a simple, effective and no diameter damage way for supporting collapsed well section, the project team devotes to research hot-melt way used in dry hole and polyurethane way used in hole with water. The paper elaborates process principle and indoor tests of the two ways in detail. Study indicate, the two kinds of nonmetal borehole wall strengthening technology have many advantages, like simple to operate, effect is significant and no diameter to diameter of borehole, which have certain application prospect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.644
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it