MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011862192 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.08.081

Dynamic Photoluminescence Lifetime Imaging for Injection-dependent Lifetime Measurements

2014· article· en· W2011862192 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sandra Herlufsen, Karsten Bothe, Rolf Brendel, Jan Schmidt

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Procedia · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Gender and Health
KeywordsPhotoluminescenceCarrier lifetimeMaterials scienceRange (aeronautics)Dynamic rangeExcitationCharge-carrier densityOptoelectronicsSiliconOpticsPhysicsElectrical engineeringDopingComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the impact of an injection-dependent carrier lifetime in crystalline silicon on dynamic photoluminescence lifetime imaging (dynamic PLI). Although the dynamic lifetime approach is a technique that evaluates the time-dependence of a quantity proportional to the excess carrier density, it is only weakly influenced by the injection-level dependence of the lifetime. The reason for the little impact is the fact that the evaluation of dynamic PLI measurements does not only involve the decay of the carrier density, as it is common for photoconductance decay measurements, but also the increase of the carrier density directly after switching on the excitation source. In this contribution, we present injection-dependent lifetime measurements that are acquired with the camera-based dynamic PLI technique. We find that the deviation of the actual steady-state carrier lifetime from the lifetime obtained with dynamic PLI is less than 20 % for a wide range of measurement conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.685
Threshold uncertainty score0.831

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy ProcediaSame topicSilicon and Solar Cell TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207