MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011895528 · doi:10.1191/0309132505ph547oa

Gender equality and progress of gender studies in Japanese geography: a critical overview

2005· article· en· W2011895528 on OpenAlex
Yohei Murata

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in Human Geography · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRural development and sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsGeographerGender studiesGender equalityHuman geographyCritical geographyHuman sexualitySociologyGeographySocial scienceHistorical geographyEconomic geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines gender equality in Japanese academic geography and provides an overview of gender studies undertaken in the discipline. First, I point out the serious gender imbalance which exists in Japanese geography, through an examination of data on gender participation in academic societies, publications and faculty promotions. Secondly, I provide an overview of geographical research on gender in Japan. Thirdly, I point out as major issues concerning gender studies in Japanese geography that the Japanese male geographer tends to misunderstand gender and ignore sexuality. In conclusion, I suggest that Japanese male geographers need to realize that gender is their own issue and that there is a need to conduct men's studies in Japanese geography.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it