MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2011895914 · doi:10.1121/1.4787967

Acoustic source localization with eye array

2006· article· en· W2011895914 on OpenAlexaff
Hedayat Alghassi, Shahram Tafazoli, Peter Lawrence

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrophoneMicrophone arrayAcousticsComputer scienceSIGNAL (programming language)Noise-canceling microphoneShell (structure)PhysicsLoudspeakerMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel signal-processing algorithm and array for sound source localization (SSL) in three-dimensional space is presented. This method, which has similarity to the eye in localization of light rays, consists of a novel hemispherical microphone array with 26 microphones on the shell and one microphone in the sphere center. The microphones on the shell map a geodesic hemisphere called two-frequency icosahedron; hence, each microphone has at least four other orthogonal microphones. A signal-processing scheme utilizes parallel creation of a special closeness function for each microphone direction on the shell in the time domain. Each closeness function cell (lens cell) consists of center microphone, shell microphone, and one of its orthogonals. The closeness function output values are linearly proportional to spatial angular difference between the sound source direction and each of the shell microphone directions. By choosing microphone directions corresponding to the highest closeness function values and implementing a linear weighted spatial averaging on them, the sound source direction is estimated. Contrary to traditional SSL techniques, this method is based on simple parallel mathematical calculations in the time domain with low computational costs. The laboratory implementation of the array and algorithm shows reasonable accuracy in a reverberant room.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America→Same topicSpeech and Audio Processing→French-language works237,207→