Bibliographic record
Abstract
The sequence of human myoglobin (Mb) is similar to that of other species except for a unique cysteine at position 110 (Cys(110)). Adding hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) to human Mb affords Trp(14)-peroxyl, Tyr(103)-phenoxyl, and Cys(110)-thiyl radicals and coupling of Cys(110)-thiyl radicals yields a homodimer through intermolecular disulfide bond formation (Witting, P. K., Douglas, D. J., and Mauk, A. G. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 20391-20398). Treating a solution of wild type Mb and H(2)O(2) with 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO) at DMPO:protein </= 10 mol/mol yields DMPO-Cys(110) adducts as determined by EPR. At DMPO:protein ratios (25-50 mol/mol), both DMPO-Tyr(103) and DMPO-Cys(110) adducts were detected, whereas at DMPO:protein >/= 100 mol/mol only DMPO-Tyr(103) radicals were present. The DMPO-dependent decrease in DMPO-Cys(110) was matched by a near 1:1 stoichiometric increase in DMPO-Tyr(103). In contrast, reaction of the Y103F human Mb with H(2)O(2) gave no DMPO-Cys(110) at DMPO:protein </= 10 mol/mol, and only trace DMPO-Cys(110) at DMPO:protein >/= 100 mol/mol (i.e. conditions that consistently gave DMPO-Tyr(103) in the case of wild type Mb). No detectable homodimer was formed by incubation of the Y103F variant with H(2)O(2). However, the homodimer was detected in a mixture of both the Y103F and C110A variants of human Mb upon treatment with H(2)O(2) (C110A:Y103F:H(2)O(2) 2:1:5 mol/mol/mol); the yield of this homodimer increased with increasing ratios of C110A:Y103F. Together, these data suggest that addition of H(2)O(2) to human Mb can produce Cys(110)-thiyl radicals through an intermolecular electron transfer reaction from Cys(110) to a Tyr(103)-phenoxyl radical.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".