MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011915618 · doi:10.1680/wama.10.00018

Groundwater intrinsic vulnerability and risk mapping

2012· article· en· W2011915618 on OpenAlexaff
Babak Farjad, Helmi Zulhaidi Mohd Shafri, Thamer Ahmed Mohamed, Saied Pirasteh, Nishad Wijesekara

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water Management · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGroundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundwaterAquiferVulnerability (computing)Environmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)Water resource managementGeologyComputer scienceGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Groundwater vulnerability mapping is an important key to improving planning and decision-making processes in order to prevent groundwater contamination. This study generates groundwater vulnerability maps for the Izeh Plain in Iran using a modified Drastic model, geographical information system and remote sensing data. Sensitivity analysis was used to assign weight by showing the importance of each parameter in the Drastic model. The highest weight (5) was assigned to the aquifer media factor of the model, which had the highest mean value (4·53), and the lowest weight was assigned to the topography factor. The resulting maps revealed that the groundwater is highly vulnerable in the southwest Izeh Plain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water ManagementSame topicGroundwater and Isotope GeochemistryFrench-language works237,207