MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011948478 · doi:10.1109/t4e.2010.5550048

A practical student model for a location-aware and context-sensitive Personalized Adaptive Learning System

2010· article· en· W2011948478 on OpenAlexaff
Guangbing Yang, Kinshuk Kinshuk, Sabine Graf

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePersonalized learningContext (archaeology)Component (thermodynamics)Adaptive learningDomain (mathematical analysis)Context modelContext awarenessDashboardHuman–computer interactionArtificial intelligenceMultimediaData scienceTeaching methodCooperative learningMathematics educationOpen learningPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Student model is an essential component in any adaptive learning environment. Various student modelling approaches have been suggested in the literature that focus on learners' competencies, preferences and other personal attributes. However, there is a lack of a comprehensive student model that combines various aspects of student modelling while also considering the aspects of location and context awareness that are important for emerging ubiquitous learning environments. This paper proposes one such student model in the context of a personalized adaptive learning system, namely Personalized Adaptive Learning Dashboard (PALD), a compound student model bringing together various features of the overlay, fault, and stereotype models to provide a generic approach to modeling student with specific domain related knowledge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningFrench-language works237,207