MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011958232 · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.173

Changing Geo-politics of Oil and the Impact on India

2014· article· en· W2011958232 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charu Rastogi

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMiddle EastChinaResource (disambiguation)PortfolioIncentiveOil reservesConsumption (sociology)BusinessPetroleumStatus quoEconomyEnergy securityGeographyNatural resource economicsDevelopment economicsEconomicsRenewable energyMarket economyEngineeringFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oil is a much sought after resource in the modern world economy. Until the previous decade, Middle East was thought to hold the maximum proven reserves of oil. This provided an incentive for western nations to maintain peace and stability in the region. However, discovery of new oil reserves in Brazil, Venezuela, Canada, Alaska and Russia, have challenged the status quo. Emerging Asian economies, namely India and China, will have to deal with an unstable supplier for one of the most important components in their energy portfolio.Given the situation, India is especially at risk as it imports almost 70% of its oil requirement, up to 65% of which originates from the Middle East. In a disruptive scenario of disturbance in the Middle East, India would find it difficult to meet its oil needs, jeopardizing its energy future. This paper analyzes India's energy consumption pattern, consumption of oil and oil products over the past four decades and the composition of India's oil import sources over the past five years. Finally, a model is proposed to secure India's energy future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcedia - Social and Behavioral SciencesSame topicMarket Dynamics and VolatilityFrench-language works237,207