The Radiographic Failure of Single Segment Anterior Cervical Plate Fixation in Traumatic Cervical Flexion Distraction Injuries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A radiographic review of 87 patients with either unilateral or bilateral facet dislocations or fracture/dislocations treated with anterior cervical discectomy, fusion, and plating. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to report the incidence of radiographic failure and factors that would predispose to this loss of alignment. The secondary objective was to report the rate of pseudarthrosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Biomechanical and clinical data conflict regarding the appropriate approach and method of fixation of distractive flexion cervical injuries. Unilateral and bilateral facet fracture subluxations may be surgically stabilized by anterior cervical discectomy, fusion, and plating, posterior instrumentation, or both. There are no documented reports of the rate of radiographic failure of this procedure when limited to a single level injury from a distractive flexion mechanism. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were all single-level unilateral and bilateral facet fracture dislocations or subluxations treated with a single-level anterior cervical discectomy, fusion, and plating. Retrospectively, 107 cases were identified (87 with complete radiographs) from January 1994 to December 2001. Radiographic failure was defined as a change in translation of greater than 4 mm and/or change in angulation of greater than 11 degrees between the immediate postoperative films and the most recent follow-up. Fusion was assessed radiographically. RESULTS: A 13% incidence of radiographic loss of alignment is reported in 87 unilateral and bilateral facet fracture subluxations stabilized with anterior cervical discectomy, fusion, and plating. Radiographic failure correlated with the presence of endplate compression fracture and facet fractures on injury radiographs. There was no correlation between radiographic failure and age, gender, surgeon, unilateral or bilateral injury, plate type, level of injury, degree of translation, or sagittal alignment at the time of injury. CONCLUSION: Loss of postoperative alignment occurred in 13% of facet fracture subluxations treated with anterior cervical discectomy, fusion, and plating. Concern regarding mechanical failure of flexion/distraction injuries should be high when they are associated with fractures of either the facets or of the endplate. Endplate fracture was associated with both mechanical failure and pseudarthrosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".