UV Photolysis of Trichloroethylene: Product Study and Kinetic Modeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Direct UV photolysis of trichloroethylene (TCE) in dilute aqueous solution generated chloride ions as a major end product and several reaction intermediates, such as formic acid, di- and monochloroacetic acids, glyoxylic acid, and, to a lesser extent, mono- and dichloroacetylene, formaldehyde, dichloroacetaldehyde, and oxalic acid. Under prolonged irradiation, these byproducts underwent photolysis, and a high degree of mineralization (approximately 95%) was achieved. TCE decays through the following major pathways: (1) TCE + h nu --> ClCH=C*Cl + Cl*; (2) TCE (H2O) + h nu --> ClCH(OH)-CHCl2; (3) TCE + h nu --> HC[triple bond]CCl + Cl2; (4) TCE + h nu --> ClC[triple bond]CCl + HCl; (5) TCE + Cl* --> Cl2HC-C*Cl2. A kinetic model was developed to simulate the destruction of TCE and the formation and fate of byproducts in aqueous solution under irradiation with polychromatic light. By fitting the experimental data, the quantum yields for the four photolysis steps were predicted as phi(1) = 0.13, phi(2) = 0.1, phi(3) = 0.032, and phi(4) = 0.092, respectively. The reaction mechanism proposed for the photodegradation of TCE accounts for all intermediates that were detected. The agreement between the computed and experimental patterns of TCE and reaction products is satisfactory given the complexity of the reaction mechanism and the lack of photolytic kinetic parameters that are provided in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".