MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012048072 · doi:10.1115/esda2006-95421

Mathematical and Finite Element Modelling of Spine to Investigate the Effects of Intra-Abdominal Pressure and Activation of Muscles Around Abdomen on the Spinal Stability

2006· article· en· W2012048072 on OpenAlexaff
Hossein Mokhtarzadeh, Farzam Farahmand, Mohammad Parninapour, Fatemeh Malekipour, Abolfazl Shirazi-Adl, Navid Arjmand

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 2: Automotive Systems, Bioengineering and Biomedical Technology, Fluids Engineering, Maintenance Engineering and Non-Destructive Evaluation, and Nanotechnology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAbdominal Surgery and Complications
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceFinite element methodVertebral columnMechanicsRib cageShell (structure)Core stabilityBiomechanicsAnatomyThoracic cavitySpinal columnDeflection (physics)Structural engineeringPhysicsComposite materialClassical mechanicsMedicineSurgeryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In spite of the several experimental and modeling studies on the biomechanical characteristics of the human spine, the role and significance of the intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in spine mechanics has remained controversial. This study represents a simple analytical and a 3-D finite element model of spine and its surrounding structures to investigate the contribution of IAP to spinal stability. The mathematical model included the lumbar spine column, the abdominal cavity and a muscular layer around it, the rib cage and the pelvic ring. The lumbar spine column was modeled as a beam and the rib cage and pelvis as rigid bodies. The intra-abdominal cavity and the surrounding muscular layer were represented by a thin-wall cylindrical vessel with deformable shell wall. The free body diagram and equilibrium equations of each body of the model were derived while an external load to the rib cage was applied. The equations were then combined with the force-deflection relationships for the beam bending, the IAP fluid volume variation, and the muscle shell traction. Muscle activation levels were simulated by changing the Young’s modulus of the shell in the direction of fibers, up to an upper-limit value which was obtained based on the Valsalva maneuver. In the Finite Element (FE) model, the abdominal cavity was assumed to be cylindrical and filled by fluid with a bulk modulus of IMPa. The surrounding muscular layer was modeled as membrane with transverse isotropic material properties considering their fibers orientation. The spine, rib cage and pelvic ring were modeled by beam elements. The top plate simulated the active and/or passive role of diaphragm through its vertical displacement. The bottom membrane and distal spine were fully constrained. Good agreement between the analytical and FE model results was obtained. A larger external force and/or higher level of muscle activation caused a higher IAP, improving spinal unloading and stability. This effect was more significant for muscles with more horizontally directed fibers, e.g., Transverse Abdominis (TA).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.889

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 2: Automotive Systems, Bioengineering and Biomedical Technology, Fluids Engineering, Maintenance Engineering and Non-Destructive Evaluation, and NanotechnologySame topicAbdominal Surgery and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207